The Cricital Approaches of Socio-Gerontechnology

One field of study the sociology of age and ageing focuses on is technology use in later life. Since, in the past, many research projects showed the tendency to be techno-optimist and mostly concerned with the question how technologies can improve older people's lives, recently, more cricital approaches evolved. These new approaches - widely refrerred to as Socio-gerontechnology -  criticise ageist stereotypes about "technology use in later life in design processes and the paternalist stance toward older adults resulting from it" as well as the techno-optimism of gerontological research. 

This includes, on the one hand, a deeper empirical engagement with design processes and innovation policy to highlight how new technologies not only address alleged problems or challenges of individual or population aging, but how they create and select certain ideas about aging that work well as targets for design or innovation policies (Bischof and Jarke, 2021; Peine and Neven, 2021). In such a view, design processes and innovation policy become important sites for our empirical understanding of age and aging, too, because they produce and reinforce societally shared ideas of how we can and should age—ideas whose contingent nature can be revealed by empirical inquiry (Lipp and Peine, 2022).

Socio-gerontechnology is also concerned about "the everyday life of older people, aging bodies and the construction of age and aging in relation to technology", how ageing is shaped by technologies and how ageing is quantified by technologies which again creates the image of the ageing body as one that is "constantly iprovable and invevitably in decline" (Gallistl et al., 2023).

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

- Gallistl, V., Katz, S., Kolland, F. & Peine, A. (2023). Editorial: Socio-gerontechnology - New perspectives on the digital transformation of later life. Front. Sociol, link
- photograph by Dennis Feldman via

Identity Politics and Vaccine Distribution

"For me, the most important and the most shocking was the way in which the United States rolled out vaccines in 2021. We had these amazing life-saving vaccines, but there were too few of them, so what were we going to do? Virtually every country in the world did it by age. But the key advisory committee to the Centers for Disease Control, called ACIP, said that even though that course of action is much easier to implement, we're not going to do that. It would, they said, be unethical because a disproportionate number of older Americans are white. Even though, according to their own causal models, adopting a different rule would increase the number of deaths by between 0.5 and 6.5%, could lead to thousands more people dying, simply prioritizing older people would be the ethically wrong thing to do. 

Instead, they recommended putting essential workers, who supposedly are more diverse, first. A couple of things happened because of that. One is that it's really hard to communicate who's an essential worker. And immediately the politicking started about being included as essential workers: Film crews were essential workers. Finance executives were essential workers. I was an essential worker, as a college professor in Maryland, at a time when I was not allowed to teach classes in person…

Then what happened is that you had way too many people eligible for the vaccine at a time when there were barely any appointments. So who got the appointments? The people who were able to refresh the websites for hours a day, or who could write computer programs to find eligible spots, or who were able to drive hours out of town in order to get to some rural pharmacy that had more capacity for some reason. They were the ones to get it. In other words, more privileged people who were probably at slightly less risk of death. AI suspect that this policy even killed more non-white people, because if you give a vaccine to two 25-year-old black Uber drivers, rather than one 80-year-old black retiree, more black people are going to die.

So here's a policy that is a life or death question; is capable of inspiring just the worst kind of zero-sum racial competition in our politics; and can easily be exploited by the political right (...)"

Yasha Mounk

- - - - - - - -

- photograph by Dennis Feldman (1969-1972, Hollywood) via

- Yasha Mounk, full interview: link