data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffadb/ffadb12eba729723bb7ae5b2e833bec2326b642d" alt=""
Assemblywoman March Fong breaks a porcelain potty with a sledgehammer on the steps of the Capitol in Sacramento, California, April 26, 1969. Photograph: Walter Zeboski/AP (description via)
"But there was a feminist case against the practice, too, and that’s the argument March Fong Eu was making. Urinals were oftentimes free, meaning the financial burden fell disproportionately on women. And as the momentum for women’s lib built, pressure grew against the practice of charging for access. NOW sometimes joined the fight. For instance, a February 1975 issue of The Cumberland News reports on hearings before the Maryland state Senate that, “‘The practice of installing and utilizing pay toilets is sexually discriminatory in that women are usually discomforted by them and men are not’."
Naomi Mestanas, National Organization for Women
"The argument against pay toilets is linked to the drive for equal rights for women. Opponents of pay toilets argue that women are unfairly handicapped by the locks on booths in public restrooms.
The publication State Government News, issued by the Council of State Governments in Lexington, Ky., reported that legislatures in 20 states were considering measures to abolish, or at least restrict, the pay toilet."
Associated Press
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65b98/65b986f72d8b4082bcd86a038cc718240d0ac516" alt=""
photographs via and via
Nice find!! Cheers!
ReplyDeleteI thought so too; hadn't come across this one before. Thanks, Karen!
DeleteHahaha, great! Thanks for the share!
ReplyDelete;-) Thanks, Derek!!
DeleteSuper, thanks!
ReplyDeleteGood morning & many thanks for leaving a comment, Erin!
Delete